Sending and Receiving Bitcoin
Addresses, confirmations, and checks to complete before you move funds on-chain.
Bitcoin Basics
Why Bitcoin's supply limit is enforced by consensus—and what changing it would require.
The 21 million cap is embedded in Bitcoin's consensus rules. Changing it would require a coordinated software change adopted by a large majority of nodes and miners. Any group that raised the cap unilaterally would fork away from the economic majority.
Historically, holders value the credible scarcity promise. Diluting supply would undermine the monetary narrative that many investors rely on, making such a change politically and economically difficult even if technically possible.
Changing the 21 million cap would require altering consensus code and persuading a supermajority of participants to adopt it. Unsupported forks become alternate chains.
Contentious forks can occur, but they split the network rather than silently changing main-chain rules.
Current holders benefit from scarcity credibility. Raising the cap would dilute positions and undermine a primary long-term narrative.
Miners depend on coin value and fee markets—short-term subsidy boosts do not automatically outweigh loss of trust.
Monitor major upgrade proposals through reputable technical summaries. Most routine improvements do not touch supply.
Self-custody plus node literacy reduces reliance on others' interpretations of what Bitcoin is.